Part One: Spatial Strategy and Policies (Regulation 19)
Search representations
Results for National Trust search
New searchSupport
Part One: Spatial Strategy and Policies (Regulation 19)
Policy DLP6 Infrastructure Provision
Representation ID: 1401
Received: 21/11/2024
Respondent: National Trust
We continue to be supportive of the proposed approach towards infrastructure provision and we are pleased to see that it is acknowledged that infrastructure investment will be required to support development, including public open space, as set out in paragraph 6.10.
Support
Part One: Spatial Strategy and Policies (Regulation 19)
Policy DLP8 Health and Wellbeing
Representation ID: 1402
Received: 21/11/2024
Respondent: National Trust
DLP8 Health and Wellbeing
We maintain support for the wording of policy DLP8, especially the need for mitigation or compensation for developments which would be likely to have a negative impact on health and wellbeing through planning conditions and/or financial/other contributions secured through planning obligations. Whilst it is not explicitly specified where such a financial contribution would be directed, given the benefits that publicly accessible open space can have towards health and wellbeing, we would expect that a proportion of the contributions go to the enhancement and maintenance of green infrastructure.
Support
Part One: Spatial Strategy and Policies (Regulation 19)
Policy DLP31 Nature Conservation
Representation ID: 1403
Received: 21/11/2024
Respondent: National Trust
Environment
We are especially supportive of paragraph 11.2 which promotes the protection and improvement of the borough’s biodiversity and geodiversity on the basis that this “will improve the attractiveness of the area for people to live, work, study and visit while at the same time improving the physical and natural sustainability of the conurbation in the face of climate change.” Paragraph 11.4 acknowledges the importance of green infrastructure, which we thoroughly support.
Support
Part One: Spatial Strategy and Policies (Regulation 19)
Policy DLP31 Nature Conservation
Representation ID: 1404
Received: 21/11/2024
Respondent: National Trust
We maintain our support for the policy approach to DLP31 and consider that the inclusion of the Regional Park within the Green Infrastructure Network can support the achievement of many of the indicators set out within the policy wording and supporting justification.
Support
Part One: Spatial Strategy and Policies (Regulation 19)
Policy DLP32 Nature Recovery Network and Biodiversity Net Gain (BNG)
Representation ID: 1405
Received: 21/11/2024
Respondent: National Trust
We are supportive of the revised approach to this policy whereby all development is required to deliver the objectives of the LNRS through the BNG requirements.
The National Trust is engaged in Local Nature Recovery Strategies and would be keen to discuss how National Trust land and initiatives, such as 8 Hills Regional Park, could contribute towards achieving the objectives of BNG and nature recovery.
We are supportive of the requirement for all development to deliver a minimum of 10% net gain in biodiversity value.
Support
Part One: Spatial Strategy and Policies (Regulation 19)
Policy DLP33 Provision, retention and protection of trees, woodlands, Ancient Woodland, and Veteran trees
Representation ID: 1406
Received: 21/11/2024
Respondent: National Trust
We remain supportive of policy DLP33 and consider that in the context of the National Trust’s recent development of a bid for a woodland creation project in the wider area, there are likely to be many opportunities where the National Trust can contribute to and support the ambition of Dudley Borough.
Support
Part One: Spatial Strategy and Policies (Regulation 19)
Policy DLP35 Geodiversity and the Black Country UNESCO Global Geopark
Representation ID: 1407
Received: 21/11/2024
Respondent: National Trust
Whilst we have not previously commented on this policy, we have identified in our discussions with the Dudley Policy team and further research on the Regional Park in Dudley, that there is likely to be a number of opportunities within the Regional Park area where the cultural heritage significance of the Global Geopark can be enhanced and communicated.
We are supportive of the principles of the policy and would be keen to explore where this is relevant within the Regional Park and how it can be best communicated.
Comment
Part One: Spatial Strategy and Policies (Regulation 19)
Policy DLP49 Green Belt
Representation ID: 1408
Received: 21/11/2024
Respondent: National Trust
Whilst we have not previously commented on this policy, as the Regional Park land is also designated Green Belt within Dudley, we felt it necessary to respond to the policy wording.
We consider that the 8 Hills Regional Park concept represents significant opportunity to enhance Dudley’s Green Belt policy on the basis that any designation of the regional park whereby any speculative or planned development within the regional park area would not only have to meet the multiple Green Belt tests and potentially demonstrate Very Special Circumstances, but would also have to adhere to the Green Infrastructure principles that would form the foundation of the regional park in its delivery. As set out in the comments to policy DLP51, the regional park would better enable Local Planning Authorities to hold developers to account to ensure that any residential schemes that may be brought forward are of the highest quality, exceed the minimum green infrastructure criteria and contribute to the regional park which could also ensure that new residential schemes are more cohesive when being considered in their local context. Additionally, given the layers of considerations that would be required to support development within the regional park area, this would ensure that poor quality developments are not accepted on the basis of only their contribution to
housing numbers. We are of the view that designating the regional park as part of Dudley’s
Green Infrastructure network could tangibly strengthen the Green Belt policy set out.
It is proposed that, building on the concept set out within the Spatial Framework, and the successful inclusion of the regional park within relevant Local Plans, that a regional SPD or some supporting policy could be developed to support the delivery of the regional park, which would add further detail to the expectations of any planned or speculative development within the Green Belt and regional park.
We are supportive of the policy wording in respect of the ambition to maintain the Green Belt to “provide easy access to the countryside where the landscape, visual amenity, nature conservation and outdoor sport and recreation value of the land will be protected and enhanced”.
Support
Part One: Spatial Strategy and Policies (Regulation 19)
Policy DLP51 Dudley Borough's Green Infrastructure Network
Representation ID: 1409
Received: 21/11/2024
Respondent: National Trust
DLP51 Dudley Borough’s Green Infrastructure Network
We are supportive of the wording of policy DLP51, and are especially supportive of the reference to the Regional Park in paragraph 13.18.
As set out earlier in this letter, we wanted to provide the following rationale and further justification for the inclusion of the Regional Park within this policy. It is our view that the designation of the regional park and inclusion within the associated Green Infrastructure policy by Dudley MBC would reinforce proposed policies within the Local Plan, including DLP55
Historic Character and Local Distinctiveness of Dudley and DLP60 Areas of High Historic Landscape Value on the grounds that the purpose of the regional park would be to improve access to open space for the public, and enable nature recovery and enhancement. Furthermore, the regional park designation presents the opportunity to enhance Green Belt policy in the context of the emerging, revised NPPF and require any development that is proposed in the vicinity of or within the regional park to deliver meaningful, high quality green infrastructure to connect with the existing network.
With regards to specific features in Dudley that could be highlighted as significant within the regional park, I have identified that there is number of existing heritage designations in the area that could be further preserved and enhanced by their position within the regional park.
Wychbury Hill is geographically and historically one of the Clent Hills, being part of the wider hill range so a clear link to the established geography being presented as part of the regional park. It is also a significant geosite within the Black Country, which has its own draw of visitors. Wychbury Hill would be most westerly point in the regional park and would make sense as a visitor gateway to the regional park – various sources of funding could be explored to establish this.
Notable features at Wychbury Hill include Wychbury Hill obelisk – grade II* listed structure, previously at risk and rebuilt and restored in 2011 – visible from peaks in Malvern and Shropshire – links to Lickey Monument (also an obelisk). Wychbury Hill also contains Wychbury Ring, an iron age hill fort. Small bronze rings, including an Iron Age terret, were
found in the fort in 1884, and Roman coins and masonry have been found nearby, suggesting a possible site of a later Roman Villa.
It is noted that there are scheduled ancient monuments in the area – St Mary’s Abbey and associated earthworks, Halesowen Abbey. The designation of the regional park could highlight and bring attention to these important heritage assets and the identified Area of High Historic Landscape Value - contains the site of Manor Colliery, Lapal Canal and Tunnel.
It is understood that areas of Ancient Woodland are found in the area of the proposed regional park to be covered by Dudley, and given the National Trust’s recent success to develop a bid for a woodland creation opportunity, these areas could be preserved and enhanced by other woodland creation, as well as funding opportunities for other woodland enhancement and creation elsewhere in the regional park.
There are a number of Sites of Importance for Nature Conservation (SINC) in the area identified which again could be enhanced by their inclusion within a designated regional park, providing the opportunity to improve preservation of these special places and improve educational opportunities for visitors to the area, through the provision of signage which is likely to be delivered throughout the regional park.
As set out in our previous consultation response, we would recommend that the Regional Park is designated on the Policies Map. We do note however that the proposed Green Infrastructure Network specifically includes the Dudley portion of the West Midlands Green Belt, and this is indicated on the Policies Map. We do however consider that further reference to the Regional Park would further strengthen the opportunities that can be identified to support the Green Infrastructure network in Dudley and more widely across the West Midlands through the Regional Park.
Comment
Part One: Spatial Strategy and Policies (Regulation 19)
Policy DLP55 Historic Character and Local Distinctiveness of Dudley
Representation ID: 1410
Received: 21/11/2024
Respondent: National Trust
As set out above, it is considered that the designation of the Regional Park can reinforce and support this policy in respect of the enhancement opportunities that could be brought forwards for archaeological features and historic character within the Regional Park area.
We are supportive of this policy, particularly in respect of the preservation and enhancement required in “Areas of High Historic Landscape Value (AHHLV) that demonstrate concentrations of important wider landscape elements of the historic environment, such as areas of open space, woodland, watercourses, hedgerows, and archaeological features, that contribute to local character and distinctiveness” and “Archaeological Priority Areas”, both of which are found within the Regional Park area.