Comment

Representation ID: 952

Received: 23/11/2024

Respondent: Mr Andrew Robertson

What would be the proposed access for this development? How would the proposed 25 houses be arranged and what kind of houses would they be?

Object

Representation ID: 953

Received: 24/11/2024

Respondent: Mr Neil Matthews

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

This is a ridiculous idea as this land forms part of a green corridor between Clent Hills through Lutley Gutter and Hawne valley onto Corngreaves Nature Reserve. I have personally witnessed many forms of wildlife including Muntjack Deer using this corridor. It would be criminal to tale away this link and would end up very dangerous for road users when confused animals are still trying to migrate through a blocked route.

Object

Representation ID: 954

Received: 24/11/2024

Respondent: Mrs Beverly Matthews

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

This is a greenfield site, small nature corridor. I have personally seen all varieties of wildlife including deer, foxes, rabbits etc. not to mention all the different varieties of birds. This is a ridiculous idea when there are soo many brownfields site in decay within the area of Halesowen

Object

Representation ID: 955

Received: 24/11/2024

Respondent: Mr Lee Kench

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Building on a greenfield site poses significant environmental risks, particularly to local wildlife such as bats, badgers, and owls, which rely on these natural habitats for sustenance and shelter. The disturbance and destruction of their ecosystems can lead to population declines and disrupt the balance of local biodiversity. Furthermore, these species are often protected under various conservation laws, necessitating thorough environmental assessments and potentially delaying or preventing construction to ensure compliance with legal protections for wildlife and their habitats. Furthermore, access to this land via the already congested & one of the busiest roads within the midlands is ridiculous.

Object

Representation ID: 956

Received: 24/11/2024

Respondent: Mrs Rachel Hodkinson

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

This is greenbelt corridor land that is used by local nature including deer from corngreaves nature reserve.

Object

Representation ID: 957

Received: 24/11/2024

Respondent: Abbie Davies

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? Yes

Duty to co-operate? Yes

This is a route for many wild animals and destroying the local habitat

Object

Representation ID: 958

Received: 24/11/2024

Respondent: Mrs Susan Owen

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Yes

This is a precious piece of green belt, needs to remain for wildlife and plants.

Object

Representation ID: 959

Received: 24/11/2024

Respondent: Mr Paul Scobell

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

There is a substantial amount of brown field sites across Dudley and Halesowen without destroying green belt and wildlife.

Object

Representation ID: 960

Received: 24/11/2024

Respondent: Ms Sallie Timms

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Yes

The area and surrounding are already over populated within 1 mile there is over 2000 new houses in the last few years. There are so many old industrial areas that could be demolished and repurposed green areas should be left for enjoyment and wildlife to nurture

Object

Representation ID: 961

Received: 24/11/2024

Respondent: Ms Wendy Jarvis

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

It’s the only bit of green land left between two corridors. It serves as an important route for nature. Plus that area is already far too busy

Object

Representation ID: 962

Received: 24/11/2024

Respondent: Mrs Sarah Scriven

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

This development would destroy the only corridor linking Clent Hills to Corngreaves Nature Reserve. Many wild animals would be affected, displaced and cut off as a result.
It should not be allowed to happen.

Object

Representation ID: 963

Received: 24/11/2024

Respondent: Mr Leigh Cotterill

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

I object as this is an important green corridor linking Corngreaves nature reserve to the Lutley wedge and Clent Hills.

Object

Representation ID: 964

Received: 24/11/2024

Respondent: Mrs Sharon Sutton

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Why build on greenfield land? The effect on the local wildlife will be devastating. It's already an extremely busy area too.

Object

Representation ID: 965

Received: 24/11/2024

Respondent: Louise Thomas

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

There is no excuse whatsoever for destroying this wildlife corridor. There are so many brown sites within the Borough, wildlife corridors must be preserved as once gone they’re gone forever.

Object

Representation ID: 967

Received: 24/11/2024

Respondent: Miss Cara Buttress

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

I think it's outrageous to develop on the remaining green corridor connecting corngreaves nature reserve to the clent hills. I feel lucky to have these green spaces on my doorstep and am not alone in feeling like this. It would be a complete crime to develop here. Animals and wildlife use this corridor. Too much of our vital natural world is being destroyed. Trees, plants and nature are vital for wellbeing and having it locally is a blessing. There are so many unused brown field sites. Surely using these spaces would be more beneficial!?

Object

Representation ID: 968

Received: 24/11/2024

Respondent: Mr Maxwell Dobbs

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Yes

As has undoubtedly been pointed out releasing this land closes a green corridor for wildlife. I country where much of it natural environment has been destroyed loosing more of it is excusable.
We know deer have been spotted in the Corngreaves nature reserve so to isolate these area reduces the overall space for wildlife to roam in.

Object

Representation ID: 970

Received: 25/11/2024

Respondent: Ms Katherine Anderson

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

The proposed development is green belt land. This land is occupied by badgers, muntjac deer, foxes, bats. These are protected animals. Also used by birds such as kingfishers and egrets. It will decimate the very important wildlife that is essential to our eco system doubled with the extra traffic along the already too busy Stourbridge Road, and encourage more traffic down the dangerous hawne lane junction and through whittingham road which is already snarled.

Object

Representation ID: 973

Received: 25/11/2024

Respondent: Mr Daniel Hadley

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

This is greenbelt land, it should be preserved, not built on.

Object

Representation ID: 974

Received: 25/11/2024

Respondent: Mrs Lisa Sullivan

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Wild life disturbance, plenty of brown sites to consider, please do not disrupt the country side

Object

Representation ID: 975

Received: 25/11/2024

Respondent: Mr Phil Coldicott

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

The proposed area of development is on an much loved & used open space, an area of nature & exercise. There is Nil Justification for building in this area….at least until all brownfield sites are exhausted.

Object

Representation ID: 977

Received: 25/11/2024

Respondent: Mrs Julia Potter

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Please consider using brownfield sites first.

Object

Representation ID: 988

Received: 26/11/2024

Respondent: Mrs Judith Hackett

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Greenbelt land should not be used

Object

Representation ID: 989

Received: 26/11/2024

Respondent: Mrs Susan Smallwood

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

We need green passageways from green sites to green sites , otherwise wildlife will be travelling on and over peoples gardens and roads. And when killed on said roads they would be a health hazard and a when crossing said roads they would be a hazard to drivers. They don’t understand our rules, plus we need to accommodate wildlife as our they affect the local environment.

Object

Representation ID: 990

Received: 26/11/2024

Respondent: Karen Bradley

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

There is no suitable access from Belle Vale or Stourbridge Road.This is a nature highway between Lutley Hawne and Corngreaves.The area supports native and nonnative wildlife including badgers,foxes,bats,muntjacs,toads,frogs,buzzards,egrets and pheasants along with more common birds.The trees and old orchard support this wildlife and help keep the air clean.
The gardens backing on to this land on Crimmond Rise have very small gardens,meaning that if this land was built on there would be no privacy .Noise from these houses would severely impact on the houses backing onto this land.
The land provides a natural quiet barrier from the noisy Stourbridge Road.

Object

Representation ID: 991

Received: 26/11/2024

Respondent: Mrs Helen Sarah Lowther

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

It is taking more green space away from where we live. I like living around nature and I don't want to see more being taken away from the area.

Object

Representation ID: 1008

Received: 26/11/2024

Respondent: Mrs Jean Barker

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

I understand that the plan has been redrawn to 25 houses, but my concerns are still the same, the loss of green space which is home to many different animals, wild life is seriously in decline and must be saved and the unsuitable access is a big concern.

Object

Representation ID: 1010

Received: 26/11/2024

Respondent: Miss Katie Flitton

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

It’s dangerous for road users to block this and it is used by wildlife

Object

Representation ID: 1031

Received: 27/11/2024

Respondent: Miss Kathryn Evans

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

The area is a much needed wildlife corridor. There are foxes, badgers and muntjac deer who move through this area. They could be forced onto the main road, causing them and others harm. Any housing would result in an increase in traffic for the main road.which very congested. There are many old orchard trees in the field.

Object

Representation ID: 1056

Received: 28/11/2024

Respondent: Mrs C Wyld

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Environmental Impact: The development would disrupt important habitats for protected species, particularly bats, which use the area for foraging. You argue that the Dudley Planning Policy Team is not adequately addressing these environmental concerns, violating wildlife protection laws and national planning policies. Criticize the quality of the technical evidence supporting the Local Plan, stating it is outdated, insufficient, and does not align with the planning policies in the revised National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF), especially regarding nature conservation and climate change resilience. Concerns regarding the destruction of semi-mature and mature trees which would contribute to the local landscape character and biodiversity. Concerns about potential access routes through the property. The narrow 3 metre drive would create noise, disruption and difficulties in accessing your home.

Comment

Representation ID: 1059

Received: 28/11/2024

Respondent: Cllr Simon Phipps

Whilst I endorse this plan, I object to a single housing allocation - DLP H042. This objection is on behalf of Councillors Peter Dobb, Daniel Bevan and myself, Simon Phipps. This is for highways, environmental and viability concerns.