Support
Part One: Spatial Strategy and Policies (Regulation 18)
Representation ID: 317
Received: 21/12/2023
Respondent: Barberry Summerhill Limited
Agent: Harris Lamb
Policy DLP 16 Education Facilities
Barberry agree that if new development places additional demands on existing schools over and above their existing capacity, then it is entirely appropriate that additional capacity should be created either through an extension to an existing facility, provision of a new facility or a financial contribution to create additional capacity. This is a well-established principle underpinning new residential development. Furthermore, the potential need to make financial contributions toward education provision must also be seen in the context of the other policy requirements that the Plan seeking to achieve and therefore, collectively may well have an impact on scheme viability. Again, we welcome the inclusion of reference to a Viability Assessment if there is any question mark over the viability of development if such contributions are sought.
Support
Part One: Spatial Strategy and Policies (Regulation 18)
Representation ID: 383
Received: 21/12/2023
Respondent: Worcester Lane Limited
Agent: Harris Lamb
Policy DLP 16 Education Facilities
WL agree that if new development places additional demands on existing schools over and above their existing capacity, then it is entirely appropriate that additional capacity should be created either through an extension to an existing facility, provision of a new facility or a financial contribution to create additional capacity. This is a well established principle underpinning new residential development. Furthermore, the potential need to make financial contributions toward education provision must also be seen in the context of the other policy requirements that the Plan seeking to achieve and therefore, collectively may well have an impact on scheme viability. Again, we welcome the inclusion of reference to a Viability Assessment if there is any question mark over the viability of development if such contributions are sought.
Comment
Part One: Spatial Strategy and Policies (Regulation 18)
Representation ID: 430
Received: 19/01/2024
Respondent: Dudley Labour Group
How will the Council plan for additional educational demands for both nursery and schools?
Comment
Part One: Spatial Strategy and Policies (Regulation 18)
Representation ID: 450
Received: 13/12/2023
Respondent: Revelan Developments Ltd
Agent: Harris Lamb
Policy DLP 16 Education Facilities
We have no objection to the Council seeking contributions towards education facilities from new development if there is a need, any education contributions sought must also be tested in the context of the other policy requirements that the Plan to ensure schemes remain viable.
Also, it is our view that affordable housing should not attract an education contribution. To qualify for an affordable property an individual/family will be registered with the Council and therefore local to the area. They will not create a demand for additional educational facilities as the residents would have to have a connection to the local to the area and already have school place provision.
Comment
Part One: Spatial Strategy and Policies (Regulation 18)
Representation ID: 611
Received: 22/12/2023
Respondent: Worcestershire County Council
Worcestershire Children First
Worcestershire Children First have reviewed the plan. Where housing is proposed, this is likely to have an impact on educational infrastructure. There is an element of cross-border migration of pupils within this region.
Any change to the housing make-up (and particularly the provision of large-scale housing) is likely to affect this and therefore we would appreciate continued inclusion in the review of such impacts.
Support
Part One: Spatial Strategy and Policies (Regulation 18)
Representation ID: 835
Received: 19/12/2023
Respondent: Sport England
Support part 4 of the policy. Suggest text is added to para 8.47 to set out that where appropriate community use agreements will be sought.