Part Two: Centres and Site Allocations (Regulation 19)
Search representations
Results for Birmingham and Black Country Wildlife Trust search
New searchObject
Part Two: Centres and Site Allocations (Regulation 19)
DLP H042
Representation ID: 1127
Received: 29/11/2024
Respondent: Birmingham and Black Country Wildlife Trust
Legally compliant? No
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? No
We would object to the allocation of this site for housing due to its proximity to/development over Local Sites, specifically Sites of Local Importance to Nature Conservation (SLINCS). It is also in the proximity of Potential Sites of Importance (PSIs) and would require a local site assessment. See full implications and references in the full comment above.
Object
Part Two: Centres and Site Allocations (Regulation 19)
DLP H053
Representation ID: 1128
Received: 29/11/2024
Respondent: Birmingham and Black Country Wildlife Trust
Legally compliant? No
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? No
We would object to the allocation of this site for housing due to its proximity to/development over Local Sites, specifically Sites of Local Importance to Nature Conservation (SLINCS). It is also in the proximity of Potential Sites of Importance (PSIs) and would require a local site assessment. It has also received strong opposition from local residents. See comment in full for full reasoning and implications.
Object
Part Two: Centres and Site Allocations (Regulation 19)
DLP H044
Representation ID: 1129
Received: 29/11/2024
Respondent: Birmingham and Black Country Wildlife Trust
Legally compliant? No
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? No
We would expect an up-to-date local site assessment to be carried out, as appropriate, to include areas currently recognized as Potential Sites of Importance (PSIs), for example, hedgerows.
Object
Part Two: Centres and Site Allocations (Regulation 19)
DLP H030
Representation ID: 1130
Received: 29/11/2024
Respondent: Birmingham and Black Country Wildlife Trust
Legally compliant? No
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? No
We would object to the allocation of this site for housing due to its proximity to/development over Local Sites, specifically Sites of Local Importance to Nature Conservation (SLINCS). It is also in the proximity of Potential Sites of Importance (PSIs) and would require a local site assessment.
Object
Part Two: Centres and Site Allocations (Regulation 19)
DLP H035
Representation ID: 1131
Received: 29/11/2024
Respondent: Birmingham and Black Country Wildlife Trust
Legally compliant? No
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? No
We would object to the allocation of this site for housing due to its proximity to/development over Local Sites, specifically Sites of Local Importance to Nature Conservation (SLINCS). It is also in the proximity of Potential Sites of Importance (PSIs) and would require a local site assessment.
Object
Part Two: Centres and Site Allocations (Regulation 19)
DLP H037
Representation ID: 1132
Received: 29/11/2024
Respondent: Birmingham and Black Country Wildlife Trust
Legally compliant? No
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? No
We would object to the allocation of this site for housing due to its proximity to/development over Local Sites, specifically Sites of Local Importance to Nature Conservation (SLINCS). It is also in the proximity of Potential Sites of Importance (PSIs) and would require a local site assessment.
Object
Part Two: Centres and Site Allocations (Regulation 19)
DLP KQH1
Representation ID: 1133
Received: 29/11/2024
Respondent: Birmingham and Black Country Wildlife Trust
Legally compliant? No
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? No
We would strongly object to the allocation of this site for development based on the development being proposed that would be over Sites of Importance of Nature Conservation and completely developing over a large Site of Local Importance for Nature Conservation.
Object
Part Two: Centres and Site Allocations (Regulation 19)
Policy DLPKQH1 (Priority Site) Land at Ketley Quarry, Kingswinford
Representation ID: 1134
Received: 29/11/2024
Respondent: Birmingham and Black Country Wildlife Trust
Legally compliant? No
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? No
We would object to the allocation of this site for development based on the development being proposed that would be over Sites of Importance of Nature Conservation and completely developing over a large Site of Local Importance for Nature Conservation.
Comment
Part Two: Centres and Site Allocations (Regulation 19)
Policy DLPLGS1 Corbett Meadow Local Green Space
Representation ID: 1135
Received: 29/11/2024
Respondent: Birmingham and Black Country Wildlife Trust
Only one increased green space allocation. We would expect to see more local green space allocations to meet your ambitions for access to green space, and ambitions for health, wellbeing, and climate resilience.