Part Two: Centres and Site Allocations (Regulation 19)

Search representations

Results for Birmingham and Black Country Wildlife Trust search

New search New search

Object

Part Two: Centres and Site Allocations (Regulation 19)

DLP H042

Representation ID: 1127

Received: 29/11/2024

Respondent: Birmingham and Black Country Wildlife Trust

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Representation Summary:

We would object to the allocation of this site for housing due to its proximity to/development over Local Sites, specifically Sites of Local Importance to Nature Conservation (SLINCS). It is also in the proximity of Potential Sites of Importance (PSIs) and would require a local site assessment. See full implications and references in the full comment above.

Object

Part Two: Centres and Site Allocations (Regulation 19)

DLP H053

Representation ID: 1128

Received: 29/11/2024

Respondent: Birmingham and Black Country Wildlife Trust

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Representation Summary:

We would object to the allocation of this site for housing due to its proximity to/development over Local Sites, specifically Sites of Local Importance to Nature Conservation (SLINCS). It is also in the proximity of Potential Sites of Importance (PSIs) and would require a local site assessment. It has also received strong opposition from local residents. See comment in full for full reasoning and implications.

Object

Part Two: Centres and Site Allocations (Regulation 19)

DLP H044

Representation ID: 1129

Received: 29/11/2024

Respondent: Birmingham and Black Country Wildlife Trust

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Representation Summary:

We would expect an up-to-date local site assessment to be carried out, as appropriate, to include areas currently recognized as Potential Sites of Importance (PSIs), for example, hedgerows.

Object

Part Two: Centres and Site Allocations (Regulation 19)

DLP H030

Representation ID: 1130

Received: 29/11/2024

Respondent: Birmingham and Black Country Wildlife Trust

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Representation Summary:

We would object to the allocation of this site for housing due to its proximity to/development over Local Sites, specifically Sites of Local Importance to Nature Conservation (SLINCS). It is also in the proximity of Potential Sites of Importance (PSIs) and would require a local site assessment.

Object

Part Two: Centres and Site Allocations (Regulation 19)

DLP H035

Representation ID: 1131

Received: 29/11/2024

Respondent: Birmingham and Black Country Wildlife Trust

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Representation Summary:

We would object to the allocation of this site for housing due to its proximity to/development over Local Sites, specifically Sites of Local Importance to Nature Conservation (SLINCS). It is also in the proximity of Potential Sites of Importance (PSIs) and would require a local site assessment.

Object

Part Two: Centres and Site Allocations (Regulation 19)

DLP H037

Representation ID: 1132

Received: 29/11/2024

Respondent: Birmingham and Black Country Wildlife Trust

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Representation Summary:

We would object to the allocation of this site for housing due to its proximity to/development over Local Sites, specifically Sites of Local Importance to Nature Conservation (SLINCS). It is also in the proximity of Potential Sites of Importance (PSIs) and would require a local site assessment.

Object

Part Two: Centres and Site Allocations (Regulation 19)

DLP KQH1

Representation ID: 1133

Received: 29/11/2024

Respondent: Birmingham and Black Country Wildlife Trust

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Representation Summary:

We would strongly object to the allocation of this site for development based on the development being proposed that would be over Sites of Importance of Nature Conservation and completely developing over a large Site of Local Importance for Nature Conservation.

Object

Part Two: Centres and Site Allocations (Regulation 19)

Policy DLPKQH1 (Priority Site) Land at Ketley Quarry, Kingswinford

Representation ID: 1134

Received: 29/11/2024

Respondent: Birmingham and Black Country Wildlife Trust

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Representation Summary:

We would object to the allocation of this site for development based on the development being proposed that would be over Sites of Importance of Nature Conservation and completely developing over a large Site of Local Importance for Nature Conservation.

Comment

Part Two: Centres and Site Allocations (Regulation 19)

Policy DLPLGS1 Corbett Meadow Local Green Space

Representation ID: 1135

Received: 29/11/2024

Respondent: Birmingham and Black Country Wildlife Trust

Representation Summary:

Only one increased green space allocation. We would expect to see more local green space allocations to meet your ambitions for access to green space, and ambitions for health, wellbeing, and climate resilience.

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.