Part One: Spatial Strategy and Policies (Regulation 18)

Support

Representation ID: 818

Received: 30/01/2024

Respondent: Historic England

DLP59. We welcome this policy.

Support

Representation ID: 819

Received: 30/01/2024

Respondent: Historic England

DLP60. We welcome this policy.

Comment

Representation ID: 820

Received: 30/01/2024

Respondent: Historic England

DLP61. We welcome this policy – the opening is a strong clause and this could be replicated in some of the earlier heritage policies to ensure that the opening clauses are strong in resisting inappropriate development. Clause 2 consider re-phrasing to ensure they are given protection – delete wherever possible and ensure that the wording is strong to protect these irreplaceable resources.

Comment

Representation ID: 821

Received: 30/01/2024

Respondent: Historic England

DLP62. Consider incorporating significance in clause 2) a. Ensure that the assessment considers the level of harm, whether there are any avoidance and mitigation measures that are suitable or any enhancement opportunities etc.

Comment

Representation ID: 822

Received: 30/01/2024

Respondent: Historic England

DLP67. How has the historic environment been considered in the process of assessing transport infrastructure needs? What heritage impact assessment has taken place when assessing which transport networks to allocate/safeguard through this policy?

Comment

Representation ID: 823

Received: 30/01/2024

Respondent: Historic England

DLP75. We welcome a reference to heritage within Clause 2) f. We have not commented on the Area of Search at this time. How has the historic environment been assessed in terms of waste proposals?

Comment

Representation ID: 824

Received: 30/01/2024

Respondent: Historic England

DLP77. We have not commented on the Area of Search at this time. How has the historic environment been assessed in terms of waste proposals?

Comment

Representation ID: 825

Received: 30/01/2024

Respondent: Historic England

DLP78. We consider a clause could be included to safeguard the significance of heritage assets, including their setting.

Comment

Representation ID: 826

Received: 30/01/2024

Respondent: Historic England

DLP82. We consider a separate clause should be in the policy to deal with mineral applications and the effects on the historic environment to ensure that all the issues are fully considered, and minerals operations are resisted where it would affect the significance of heritage assets, including their setting. We also consider that there should be a policy on restoration schemes and ensuring that there are appropriate measures in place once mineral operations have ceased.

Comment

Representation ID: 827

Received: 30/01/2024

Respondent: Historic England

DLP87.Consider including a clause for the historic environment and protecting the significance of heritage assets which can be affected by noise pollution.